Bring in Chilean-style super tender process: Grattan InstituteBY JAMES FERNYHOUGH | MONDAY, 28 APR 2014 12:40PMThe government should get involved in picking default superannuation funds in order to increase competition and bring down fees, a Grattan Institute report has argued. Related News |
Editor's Choice
Iress says its GitHub user space was breached
Iress has disclosed to shareholders that its private user space with software code repository GitHub was subjected to a cyber-attack over the weekend.
Federal Court rejects two CBA class actions
The Federal Court shut down two class actions against Commonwealth Bank of Australia (CBA) relating to anti-money laundering and counter-terrorism financing (AML/CTF).
Chalmers makes bold inflation prediction
The Federal Treasurer says he believes inflation will come back into the Reserve Bank's target range sooner than predicted.
UniSuper restores online services, app
UniSuper's systems are back online, after close to two weeks of disruption.
Products
Featured Profile
Robert De Dominicis
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
GBST HOLDINGS LIMITED
GBST HOLDINGS LIMITED
It was during a family sojourn to the seaside town of Pescara, Italy, Rob DeDominicis first laid eyes on what would become the harbinger of his future. Andrew McKean writes.
What a strange place for the Grattan Institute to source a superannuation fee model. Was that the land of the Juntas until recently? Apples with apples should be compared. It should not always be about fees. Industry super always talk up its low fee structure not considering some vanilla retail funds which also have low fee structures.
Many industry superannuation funds do not have anti detriment inclusions Fees created within our superannuation can include necessary commonwealth government compliance.
Keep up the think tanking Grattan Institute.